the justification of stepford *****SPOILERS*****

ok
if you've watched stepford wives
(the new version)
then maybe you can tell me
how this following things make sense
if you've not watched it yet
and you want to go see the movie
you may want to skip this blog

here goes...
justification for how the wives become "robots":
they're controlled through neural implants in their brain
well if that's the case
how come the wife at the square dance sparks?
-even if we allow for some suspension of reality
when the wife starts spinning at super human speeds
the sparks seem like something a "robot" could do
but not a human with little implants in her brain
how come bette midler's character
(after she's taken over)
can put her hand on a burning stove and not burn?
she doesn't have burns on her hand afterwards
and if the toy robot dog
really was a prize terrier
how come it looks like a toy dog
instead of a real one...
did they just take the brain of the little guy
and stick it in a robot body?
ok,
finally
when matthew and nicole's characters
go down into the inner sanctum
there's a robot body lying on the slab
it's looks hollow
so maybe it's something that fits or grafts
over the body of the body of the wife?
like a robotic jump suit?
that's about the only way i could think of explaining
how the wives could spark or not burn
but it still doesn't really explain the terrier
nor does it explain nicole's long blonde hair at the end
that being said
when the wives are finally "freed" at the end
if they were wearing robotic suits,
you'd think they would do something about them
ok,
that's all
if anyone can figure out
a justification for all these inconsistencies
i'd love to hear them
in the end
it's just a movie
but still...
one should TRY to make them believable :)